– Is court-referred mediation really mediation?

Doris Bozin
4.15 in Wilarra

Other sessions in this timeslot
Pre-mediation inter.. 45min
What red tape.. 45min

Back to program

Over the last number of decades, courts in both Australian State and Federal civil jurisdictions have relied on alternative dispute resolution processes to deal with the increasing volume of cases, against the back-drop of decreasing court and justice agency budgets and the increasing complexity of cases.

One of those dispute resolution processes used by courts is court-referred mediation. This requires parties to attend a mediation prior to the matter being heard by a judicial officer. However, what does court referred mediation mean for the process, outcome and type of justice that litigants will receive? What does it mean for the justice system as a whole? And more importantly, is court-referred mediation in fact a genuine mediation?

Parties have an expectation that when they commence proceedings in court they will achieve some sort of justice through that legal process, i.e. a judge will make a decision based on the law. When a matter is referred to mediation, however, this may not necessarily be realised, as mediation is about principles such as self-determination; autonomy and the empowerment of the parties, along with parties undertaking the process voluntarily and in good faith.

Court referred mediation is different from other types of mediations because it takes place under the auspices of the legal system. Also, generally, mediators who do this work have knowledge and/or experience in that area of law, and they will offer a prediction on a probable court outcome, should the case go to hearing.

In that sense, court-referred mediation is just another step in the court process – something that parties are required to do prior to going to hearing. This process allows the disputing parties to listen to the mediator who has expertise and knowledge, and then make an informed decision on whether to proceed to hearing, and therefore, potentially saving them and the courts time, money and effort, as well as helping to remove uncertainly in the legal process. By this definition then, court-referred mediation is in fact closer to an assessment of the case, rather than mediation as such.

Court referred mediation is challenging the definition of mediation, which has consequences for the legal system, mediation and key-stakeholders.

Get to know Doris Bozin
Doris BozinMs Doris Bozin is an adjunct professor at the Law and Justice Studies School at the University of Canberra (UC). She has had a wide range of legal experience – working as a prosecutor with Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions; registrar and managing registrar with the ACT Magistrates Court; practitioner in public and private practice; academic at the UC, teaching a wide range of units, including ADR in Law. Doris is also an accredited mediator and conciliator. While working at the ACT Magistrates Court, she set up the Dispute Resolution Unit dealing with all civil claims. Presently, she is a PhD candidate, with her topic examining the dispute resolution processes in Australian courts.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s